Sycurio Blog

Non-Compliance Risks in Financial Services: 2025 Guide

Written by Sycurio | August 19, 2025

Introduction 

Overview of compliance expectations in the financial sector 

In today’s fast-evolving financial landscape, compliance is more than just a regulatory checkbox—it’s a core function of risk management and institutional integrity. Financial institutions face increasing scrutiny from regulators, consumers, investors, and law enforcement agencies across the globe.  

From anti-money laundering (AML) and data privacy laws to PCI DSS compliance, where solutions such as Sycurio descope sensitive card data from the contact center to simplify compliance, there’s a growing list of legal obligations that banks, insurers, wealth managers, fintech companies, and brokers must follow. 

PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard): An industry security standard mandated by card networks. Non-compliance can result in fines from acquiring banks, higher transaction fees, liability for breaches, and reputational damage. 


As a result, non-compliance risks in financial services are no longer isolated incidents. They are systemic threats that can lead to financial penalties, reputational damage, criminal investigations, and, in extreme cases, the downfall of an entire firm.
 

What is Non-Compliance in Financial Services? 

Definition and scope of non-compliance 

Non-compliance refers to the failure of a financial institution to adhere to rules, laws, regulations, or internal standards required to operate legally and ethically. This can be due to negligence, deliberate wrongdoing, or inadequate systems and controls. 

The risk of non-compliance goes beyond fines. It includes potential operational disruption, market distrust, investor withdrawals, and increased audit or supervisory oversight. Non-compliance can also reduce the value of a firm’s brand and customer relationships, which are critical in a competitive financial ecosystem. 

Common examples: AML, KYC, OFAC, BSA, PCI DSS, data privacy violations 

Here are some of the most common compliance areas where non-compliance can occur: 

  • BSA (Bank Secrecy Act): Failing to file currency transaction reports (CTRs) or suspicious activity reports (SARs). 
  • Data Privacy: Violations under regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and GLBA, including improper handling, storing, or transferring of customer data. 

Each of these areas represents significant regulatory exposure and contributes to what makes non-compliance risks in financial services so impactful. 

Most Common Compliance Risk Areas 

Financial institutions operate in complex ecosystems. That complexity breeds multiple points of failure. Below are the most vulnerable risk areas where compliance lapses frequently occur: 

Operational risks 

Operational non-compliance stems from poorly designed processes, lack of internal oversight, or outdated technologies. Examples include: 

  • Inefficient internal controls or segregation of duties 
  • Lack of automated monitoring systems 
  • Missed or incorrect reporting to regulators 

Even without malicious intent, operational gaps can create severe vulnerabilities. In the UK, Mastercard’s Vocalink subsidiary was fined £11.9 million for internal control failures, setting a precedent for financial market infrastructure entities. 

Cybersecurity and data breaches 

With the digitization of financial services, cyber threats are a major compliance concern. A data breach can trigger regulatory investigations, and if firms are found lacking safeguards (e.g., encryption, access controls), they can face significant penalties under data protection laws like GDPR or CCPA. 

Financial institutions must implement data encryption, access controls, endpoint protection, and incident response plans to remain compliant. Neglecting these responsibilities not only invites non-compliance risks but also undermines public trust. 

Vendor and third-party access risks 

As financial institutions increasingly rely on outsourcing and third-party vendors for everything from IT infrastructure to KYC processing, third-party risk management becomes essential. Poor due diligence or vendor breaches can transfer compliance liability to the financial institution. 

For instance, a fintech company using a third-party payment gateway that doesn't comply with PCI DSS standards may be held accountable for any resulting data breaches. 

SEC/FINRA violations 

In the U.S., financial services firms must comply with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Violations include: 

  • Inadequate recordkeeping of emails and messages. 
  • Unregistered trading or investment advisory activities. 
  • Insider trading or misleading advertising. 

Interactive Brokers, for example, has faced multiple enforcement actions from the SEC, CFTC, and FINRA primarily for deficiencies in its AML program, including inadequate monitoring and reporting of suspicious transactions. 

OFAC sanctions risk 

Failing to screen transactions against OFAC’s sanctions lists can lead to hefty penalties. In cross-border payments or correspondent banking, institutions must be especially diligent in checking whether a counterparty is on a prohibited list. 

Sanctions violations are not only financial risks—they also raise national security concerns and can lead to criminal investigations. 

Regulatory technology (RegTech) misconfiguration 

Even well-intentioned firms using RegTech tools for compliance can face risk if these tools are misconfigured or not monitored. Algorithms that incorrectly flag or fail to flag suspicious transactions can trigger enforcement actions or create systemic blind spots. 

Case Studies: Cost of Non-Compliance 

To understand what the risks of non-compliance are, real-world examples are essential. 

Paxos Trust (2025) 

In August 2025, Paxos Trust settled with the New York Department of Financial Services for $48.5 million after the agency found that Paxos had significant AML compliance deficiencies. The regulator cited inadequate due diligence processes, particularly in its dealings with Binance. The settlement included a $26.5 million fine and a $22 million investment in improving its compliance program. 

Monzo Bank (2024) 

UK digital bank Monzo was fined £21.1 million by the Financial Conduct Authority for systemic failures in AML controls. These included onboarding practices that failed to verify customers properly and transaction monitoring that allowed red flags to go undetected for months during its rapid expansion. 

Mastercard’s Vocalink (2024) 

Vocalink, a subsidiary of Mastercard, was fined £11.9 million by the Bank of England for not acting on repeated warnings to address internal control weaknesses, marking the first such fine issued to a financial market infrastructure provider. 

Danske Bank (Historical) 

In one of the largest money laundering scandals in history, Denmark’s Danske Bank was fined over €2 billion for failing to prevent the laundering of over €200 billion through its Estonian branch between 2007 and 2015. 

These case studies demonstrate that the cost of non-compliance is rising—and regulators are becoming less tolerant of oversight failures. 

High-profile data breaches at firms like Target and British Airways also highlight the cost of PCI DSS non-compliance. These incidents led to regulator penalties, lawsuits, and long-term damage, risks Sycurio helps financial institutions mitigate by preventing sensitive payment data exposure. 

Consequences of Non-Compliance 

Financial penalties and fines 

Fines can range from thousands to billions of dollars, depending on the severity, duration, and scope of the violation. Global enforcement trends show a shift toward harsher penalties and broader international cooperation between regulators. 

According to Fenergo’s 2023 global financial crime compliance report, global regulators imposed over $6.6 billion in penalties related to anti-money laundering (AML), know your customer (KYC), and sanctions violations, marking a 57% increase from 2022. This surge reflects intensified enforcement actions and broader international cooperation among regulators.  

License revocation and legal actions 

In extreme cases, non-compliance may lead to the suspension or revocation of a license to operate. Criminal charges may be filed against senior management, especially in cases of willful misconduct or cover-ups. 

For example, in India, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has taken punitive action against several non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) for not following KYC and AML protocols. 

Reputational damage and loss of trust 

A firm’s reputation is arguably its most valuable asset. Non-compliance incidents frequently result in negative headlines, customer churn, and loss of investor confidence. Public trust takes years to build—and seconds to lose. 

According to Interbrand’s Best Global Brands Report, intangible assets—including brand reputation—account for approximately 30% of a company’s total market value on average. Interbrand is a leading global brand consultancy known for rigorously measuring brand value based on financial performance, brand strength, and role in purchase decisions. 

How to Mitigate Non-Compliance Risks 

Conducting internal audits and risk assessments 

Regular audits help institutions uncover weaknesses before regulators do. These audits should include control testing, policy reviews, and process simulations to ensure staff are following protocols. 

Risk assessments should be dynamic, accounting for emerging threats like AI misuse, deepfake fraud, and evolving sanction regimes. 

Staff training and compliance certifications 

Compliance starts with people. Training employees on legal obligations, ethics, and red flag indicators can drastically reduce the chance of violations. 

Advanced compliance certifications like CAMS (Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist) and CRCM (Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager) can equip your team to manage complex risks. 

Leveraging RegTech tools  

Modern compliance requires modern tools. In the secure payments space, Sycurio provides RegTech solutions that descope card data from contact centers and digital channels, ensuring PCI DSS compliance while improving CX and AX.  Through DTMF masking, secure payment links and integrations with payment service providers for tokenization, Sycurio ensures sensitive information never reaches agent desktops, networks, or recordings, dramatically reducing PCI DS scope. 

By automating critical compliance tasks, RegTech tools reduce human error, ensure faster response times, and provide audit trails for every decision. 

Implementing robust third-party due diligence 

Implementing structured vendor onboarding, continuous monitoring, and annual compliance assessments ensure your partners uphold the same standards as your internal team. 

Use tools that screen vendors against watchlists, analyze data protection policies, and flag subcontracting risks. Remember, you are only as compliant as your weakest link. 

Recap of key risks and best practices 

The non-compliance risks in financial services are real, measurable, and often avoidable. From massive fines and license suspensions to reputational damage and criminal liability, the impact of ignoring compliance obligations can be catastrophic. 

But with the right combination of internal controls, employee education, RegTech solutions like Sycurio, and strong third-party governance, financial institutions can create a culture of compliance that’s sustainable and defensible. 

Don’t wait for regulators to point out your weaknesses. Start strengthening your compliance framework today to protect your institution, customers, and reputation. 

FAQs 

What are the penalties for non-compliance in banking? 

Penalties vary widely but can include multi-million-dollar fines, license suspensions, criminal charges against executives, and mandatory remediation programs. In severe cases, banks may face closure or forced mergers. 

What are the financial consequences of non-compliance? 

Financial consequences include regulatory fines, legal fees, remediation costs, increased audit expenses, and lost revenue due to reputational damage and customer attrition. 

What are the high-risk areas for non-compliance? 

High-risk areas include AML, KYC, OFAC sanctions, data privacy, cybersecurity, vendor management, SEC/FINRA rules, and PCI DSS for payment card data security.